| Ergebnis (50 % = 154,0 MP) |
|---|
| Rang | Nr. | Paar | MP | % | CP |
|---|
| 1. | 8 | Fr. Klenert – Fr. Pesl | 195,0 | 63,31 | 22 |
| 2.-3. | 4 | Fr. Berger – Fr. Franz | 194,0 | 62,99 | 15 |
| 2.-3. | 16 | Fr. Lueg-Walter – Fr. Dr. Socolescu | 194,0 | 62,99 | 15 |
| 4. | 15 | Fr. Cajan – Hr. Dornier | 185,0 | 60,07 | 9 |
| 5. | 14 | Fr. Müller-Frey – Hr. Heupel | 174,0 | 56,49 | 7 |
| 6. | 11 | Fr. Hochmann – Fr. Jäger | 167,0 | 54,22 | 5 |
| 7. | 5 | Fr. Hoecker – Fr. Lay | 159,0 | 51,62 | |
| 8. | 13 | Hr. Heidecke – Hr. Michev | 158,0 | 51,30 | |
| 9. | 9 | Fr. Allmann – Fr. Fleischer | 156,0 | 50,65 | |
| 10. | 3 | Fr. Rieß – Hr. Lodahl | 155,0 | 50,32 | |
| 11. | 7 | Fr. Feldbausch – Fr. Wendel | 136,0 | 44,16 | |
| 12. | 10 | Fr. Baumann – Fr. Blank | 129,0 | 41,88 | |
| 13. | 12 | Fr. Göbel – Fr. Roth | 127,0 | 41,23 | |
| 14.-15. | 1 | Fr. Kalt – Hr. Horzel | 112,0 | 36,36 | |
| 14.-15. | 2 | Fr. Schmid – Fr. Widemann | 112,0 | 36,36 | |
| 16. | 6 | Fr. Dittmann – Hr. Baurmann | 111,0 | 36,04 | |
